Teaneck Blog

Casting a wary eye on Teaneck politics and municipal affairs

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Coming down the 'pike

Dwelling as we do alongside the New Jersey Turnpike, Teaneck residents have extra reason to be interested in the outcome of deliberations over the future of that major highway. Among the many ideas being kicked around Trenton by elected officials is a sale or lease of the Turnpike to a private owner/operator for a large upfront cash payment. Similar deals elsewhere have raised significant sums, providing quick cash for governments to apply toward other pressing obligations and freeing them of the responsibility for maintaining and improving transportation infrastructure.

Given that New Jersey faces numerous well-chronicled financial difficulties and that it happens to own one of the toll roads most coveted by private investors, the temptation to realize the value of the New Jersey Turnpike (estimated by some to be in the neighborhood of $20 billion) is hard to resist. Could the fact that private investments in toll roads have become wildly popular at the same time that state legislators have stalled in their efforts to resolve New Jersey's fiscal problems represent some extraordinarily good luck for New Jerseyans?


I'm not so sure. Put aside the fact that the first thing a private investor will do is jack up prices on New Jersey drivers. While this might create hardships for some (and is certainly at the heart of popular opposition to any move to sell or lease the Turnpike), those who use and benefit from a particular thoroughfare should indeed bear the cost for it.

The real problem with this potential fix to New Jersey's budget woes is that it would allow our Governor and state legislators to wriggle out of the promises they made to enact reforms that would fix a broken system. With $20 billion to fund property tax credits, state assistance to local schools, and other important priorities, the incentive to compel municipalities and school boards to merge or share services will diminish. The urgency with which changes to the education funding formula is being reworked will fade. The will to take unpopular but necessary belt-tightening decisions (for example, reducing benefits for state employees) will evaporate, too. Of course, there is also the question of whether a government that has failed to balance its budget for six straight years can be trusted with a large sum of unallocated money in the first place.


We can only sell the Turnpike once (at least in our lifetimes). With the astronomical sums other public assets are attracting these days, now might be a good time to do it from a financial standpoint. It is far less clear that it is the right time to do it from a policy perspective.

9 Comments:

At 5:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Could we buy a piece nearby and put up our own toll station? It would be sort of like what Paramus does by having the stores and forcing everybody else to be closed Sunday (when we in Teaneck would do quite well were we open).
Our revenue would let us cut our taxes once we paid off the debt for purchasing the piece of 'pike.

 
At 11:17 AM, Blogger Teaneck Blog said...

While I realize that this suggestion was not entirely serious, any additional tollbooths built or increases in toll charges could lead to traffic spillover onto our local roads and other major arteries such as Route 4 or I-80. If DMV traffic will choke Teaneck Rd., just imagine what a few thousand extra commuter vehicles could do to our streets.

 
At 1:23 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I believe the reason there aren't any tolls up here at exit 70 on I-95 is because this leg of the road isn't technically the New Jersey Turnpike. When traveling north, I believe the NJT formally ends at the Exit 18 toll-gate (an "exit" that isn't really an exit, just the end of the toll road).

Not it changes the main point of this topic, but I would think it quite likely that the part of the highway we live alongside would not be included in any lease or sale.

 
At 10:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

While i usually agree with the blogger's analysis, i think there is some bad economics here. One need not traverse a road directly in order to benefit from it. Goods and services are delivered more expeditiously when there is a system of highways and other infrastructure. This is the argument for public provision of infrastructure rather than waiting for the private sector to identify a profit opportunity. What would Teaneck be like without a system of roads leading into, out, and past it?

 
At 4:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Uncle is Right.
But we have failed in recent years to use the daily population to the max...We need some new balanced development to do this for us and help pay our bills.

 
At 4:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who writes Teaneck Blog? You should put your name on this. Keeping your name off of this makes it look like you have something to hide.

 
At 12:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check out our New Blog
http://teanecktalk.blogspot.com/

 
At 12:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check out our New Blog
http://teanecktalk.blogspot.com/

 
At 5:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's hysterical! An anonymous poster writes that the blogger should reveal his name. What difference does it make? Judge the postings by their content. I can understand why someone posts anonymously. I write comments anonymously because my identity has nothing to do with what I write.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home