Teaneck Blog

Casting a wary eye on Teaneck politics and municipal affairs

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Birdsall view: the report in context

The Birdsall Engineering report on development opportunities in Teaneck did not break a lot of new ground. In pointing out in writing what laymen have concluded through common sense, the true value of the report does not lie in its content, but rather in its ability to serve as a general guideline and provide political cover for the steps needed to stir Teaneck from its economic torpor. At $80,000 plus, that may not be a bargain, but we could yet get our money's worth.

The recommendations of this report will not remake the landscape of Teaneck. Nor will they do the heavy lifting required to shift the homeowner tax burden. They do not even provide the Council a step-by-step guide to redeveloping Teaneck's commercial and industrial zones so as to maximize their value to the Township and its tax base. But anyone who had hoped that a report could do any of these was dreaming.

What Teaneck's taxpayers and their elected representatives got for their money is a reference document that ought to give them the confidence to move forward and remake Teaneck's regulations and zoning to accomodate the new realities of the local and regional economy. It's hard to believe that it takes a consulting study to make people realize it, but the days of Teaneck as the home of light industry are long past. Everybody realizes that there is plenty of unexploited potential in all of Teaneck's commercial districts, and that a little rebuilding could go a long way toward revitalizing them. We did not really need to pay someone to tell us that Teaneck Rd. could do with some pedestrian safety improvements and better code enforcement.

However, the reality is that it is a lot easier to marshal the resources necessary to make these changes with this kick in the pants from development professionals (think of them as personal trainers for an out of shape township that wants to get fit). The next steps seem clear. Teaneck's leadership ought to make the changes necessary to attract private investment into the Township in a non-threatening way. While the market to must be allowed to determine the priorities, it is quite clear that neighborhood concerns still predominate in Teaneck, and priority should be given to reinvigorating existing business zon
es before paving over parks.


Next stop: Penn Station?! One of the many recommendations

12 Comments:

At 12:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well duh -- of course. The devil is always in the details. There are people who have been recommending to the council for over 15 years to make metered parking like in Englewood, Hillsdale and Ridgewood. I do wonder how much Birdsall actually understands the limitations of dealing with flood plains and environmentally sensitive areas like along the Hackensack River...

 
At 1:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Read through the report. It has some good suggestions, but pretty much the entire second half of the report is just a listing of design principles in general for any downtown - probably it was just taken out of their previous report and reprinted.

 
At 1:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The report was a total waste of the taxpayers monies!

 
At 1:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with Teaneck Blog - these type of reports are all about providing cover to our elected officials to undertake policies that may be politically unpopular in certain sectors. At the end of the day, if things don't work out, the politicians can always blame the consultants for providing bad advice.

I also agree with nombody that the second half of the report is consultant boilerplate. It's good stuff and it bears repeating, but it's definately a cut and paste job.

 
At 1:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

One thing to add - I'm all in favor of direct train service to NYC. I fear it ain't going to happen in my lifetime though.

 
At 7:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The report states it was "Prepared By: Birdsall Engineering, Inc. & Directions Downtown, LLC."

I have heard rumors that Birdsall did not have the expertise to perform the study requested by the council and would sub-contract the actual work. Does anyone know if that is the case and whether that's how Directions Downtown became involved?

 
At 11:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The former mayor is the transportation expert. Where do we stand on this issue. I ll tell you , if they ban the auto the people of teaneck are stranded

 
At 8:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As I've mentioned before I was a bit skeptical that the town had hired an engineering firm for what is essentially a real estate consulting assignment. Birdsall's website is vague enough to suggest that they may have in-house talent to undertake a real estate analysis. What appears to have happened is that they didn't have the in-house talent and outsourced a bulk of the work to another firm. This happens all the time. Since they probably didn't do most of the work and are probably collecting a fee for passing the work onto another firm, it once again raises question of why they were selected to perform the job in the first place...

 
At 8:58 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

still waiting for the train said...
The former mayor is the transportation expert. Where do we stand on this issue. I ll tell you , if they ban the auto the people of teaneck are stranded


Actually, Mr. Art Vatsky is the transportation "expert". He has chimed in at Council meetings on numerous occasions with his advice on these issues in his capacity as a consulting engineer. Maybe we should hire him.

 
At 9:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This gentleman's advice, on this, and any other matter, comes gratis. Haven't we heard his opinion on any and every matter ever brought before council? I think we have heard enough. I would sooner pay NOT to hear it.

 
At 12:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

DITTO

 
At 3:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would like to at least interview him.. just to see his resume. I bet it is many pages thick. He often talks about his skills but never mentions any accomplishments

 

Post a Comment

<< Home