Teaneck Blog

Casting a wary eye on Teaneck politics and municipal affairs

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Another weapon in the NIMBYite arsenal

A recent court decision further empowers New Jersey municipalities to exercise control over development through the use of eminent domain. The New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the Mount Laurel Township's right to seize land (upon which its own planning board had approved the construction of housing units), for no other reason than the potential strain on the local school system from an influx of families with school age children.

Builders throughout the state may shudder at the increased risk their planned projects now face, even if they are completely in compliance with local zoning regulations. Neighborhood crusaders such as Teaneck's own Coalition for Community Preservation, on the other hand, should be pleased that local governments cannot claim to be powerless to halt developments that are unpopular. In granting such wide discretion to municipalities to act against private landowners, the Court has strengthened the hand of well-organized community activists at the expense of individuals. This may in fact serve to protect the public good from the self-interested behavior of individuals in some cases, but it does so by placing a lot of faith in the ability of government to make just decisions under difficult circumstances.


How does this shift the balance of power in Teaneck, if at all? A development minded Council will not be able to sit idly by and claim they can do nothing in the face of community protests against particular developments. If Teaneck officials wish to halt a particular project, they can do it, and the neighborhood activists know that. Claiming to be pro-development and in favor of boosting ratables is not all that uncontroversial anymore- it may actually require sticking one's neck out and risking the ire of the voters. What a delicious irony.

3 Comments:

At 6:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Beware what you wish for. Several years ago 60 Minutes profiled an eminent domain case in Lakewood,Ohio. A developer wanted a tract condemned to build condo's and a strip mall. The criteria to seize the property was any house in the tract that DID NOT have an attached garage could be taken. The homes had all been built in the 1930's in an exquisitely maintained community. All the homes were condemned. The criteria to size property under eminent domain can have virtually any form.

 
At 12:05 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

One can only think, with the inexperience on the current board that they know what a good decision is? I hope they never live long enough to regret.

 
At 8:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This cuts both ways. Eminent domain can also be used to promote developmnent. Don't be surprised if the Planning Board hasn't considered this. Their eyes are set on the entire swath along the Hackensack River from Bogota to New Milford for multi-family development. Condemning single family houses and re-zoning parkland including the Hackensack River Walk are all in play.

Remember this is the group that thought paving over Brett Park was just swell. Be afraid, be very afraid. These guys know no boundaries, they are young, inexperienced,arrogant and mainly out to promote their own self-interests. Go to the next Planning Board meeting. Kick up a fuss if it doesn't start on time (the vote Elie needs is always an hour late) and learn what they are up to.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home