The power of posting
A local Internet controversy has spilled over into real life litigation, as a familiar cast of characters prepares to engage in a courtroom battle over a series of accusatory postings on NJ.com's Bogota forum. Today's Record reports that headline hogging Bogota mayor Steve Lonegan has filed a defamation of character suit against Bill Brennan, well-known to Teaneck residents as the former TFD firefighter who won a seven figure settlement against the town. Brennan is also famous for forcing out former Teaneck Councilman Mike Gallucci after jousting with him in Internet forums.
Whether this formidable gadfly costs another local elected official his position or whether Lonegan's legal action silences him, it is fascinating to behold how the Internet has reshaped the political landscape. Sure, this development was entirely predictable. Given the way the Internet has grown in its influence on the national political process, it was only a matter of time before this powerful medium made its influence felt in local public affairs. Still, the political scene in our area proved a tougher nut to crack, and the breakthrough was longer in coming. Traditionally an insiders' game played by old timers, the political scene in our area has not been characterized by transparency, openness to new viewpoints, or lively public debate.
It is my hope that the observations, discussions, and debates presented on this and other websites dedicated to local issues will make a positive contribution to the community conversation. While the bitter legal wrangling between Lonegan and Brennan provides a sobering reminder of the need to publish our thoughts responsibly, it also highlights the Internet's empowerment of the citizenry by giving it the ability to air views in an easily accessible public forum. Let's keep the discussion going.
18 Comments:
Great post.
they both have big mouths and larger egos
On the advice of counsel, I have nothing to add.
Totally on the mark -- and in my opinion, the deserve each other!
"The Power of Posting?" Anyone have any stats on how many handfuls of people actually read any of this stuff? We've got to reach far higher (or is it lower?) levels of acrimony to get people to read any of these posts.
Maybe Mr. Brennan can be offered an incentive to post here. No need for any payment, he can just the proceeds of his usual and customary legal settlements.
Alan Sohn
Brennan is also famous for forcing out former Teaneck Councilman Mike Gallucci after jousting with him in Internet forums.
While Brennan may be famous for this, it's a bit of an exageration. The Fire Department and the mayor were calling for Mr. Gallucci's resignation. This no doubt influenced Mr. Gallucci's decision , but than he had already announced that he was retiring from the council at the end of his term as he was moving out of Teaneck.
After what Gallucci said about the Fire Dept regarding the tragic fire he deserved any barbs directed at him. His actions were deplorable and he deserved to the thrown off the Council.
He should have know better as an elected official.
But that matter is hopefuly behind us and we need to move on as a UNITED Teaneck. Bitter name calling and false allegations will only bring us down, if we can go any lower than we are.
We need to move FORWARD rather than keep taking steps backward.
Enough is enough--how much more can the tax payers take??
Alan - To answer your questions about stats. Both this blog and Teaneck Progress have Site Meters. I'm not sure that Teaneck Blog's site meter is accessible to the public, but the Teaneck Progress site meter is. You can click on the site meter logo at the bottom of the page to see stats on recent visits.
Here's a rundown of recent activity:
Total Visits Since Installation of Site Meter: 6168
Average Daily Visits: 68
Average Visit Length: 3:27
Visits This Week: 476
Visit volume is steady on weekdays with a precipitous drop on Saturdays. Sunday visits are higher than Saturday, but below weekday levels.
I've observed that when posts or comments are controversial or inflamatory, visit volume increases, so if the goal is to use the internet to increase the dialogue among disparate members of the community, perhaps we should encourage trolls like Brennan to participate.
swurgle said...
...if the goal is to use the internet to increase the dialogue among disparate members of the community, perhaps we should encourage trolls like Brennan to participate.
We have enough "trolls" on already.
"The Power of Posting?" Anyone have any stats on how many handfuls of people actually read any of this stuff? We've got to reach far higher (or is it lower?) levels of acrimony to get people to read any of these posts.
The point was not to be self-congratulatory, but to reflect on the newfound influence of the medium. More evidence of this surfaced today, albeit on the state level.
That said, Teaneck Blog has registered 11,240 visits since May, an average of 86 per day, with usage patterns similar to those of Teaneck Progress. Perhaps it is just the same committed core of people who have been attending Council and BoE meetings and glancing at the Suburbanite before tossing it who are reading and posting on the various blogs and message forums, but given recent developments I have a hunch that others are taking notice.
Yikes Swurgle --
Alan was obviously speaking facetiously, but you seem almost...(gulp)serious.
Needless to say, inducing more people to log on to watch a train wreck is not the same as "increasing the dialogue." As Forest Gump would say, "And that's all ah haf to say about that."
Question about your site meter: does it count each visit by the poster who logs on 10-15 times a day to see what's new? If so, 68 visits a day is incredibly low.
Anon - I was also being facetious about the trolls.
And I have no idea as to the number daily repeat visitors.
The readership may be low by whatever standard you use, but when I started the thing I had no expectation that anyone would read it at all.
does it count each visit by the poster who logs on 10-15 times a day to see what's new?
Depends how much time elapses between those visits, but the short answer is no.
It's the same 10 people reading and commenting:
* BOE insider
* Mean racist crank
* voice of reason (Alan Sohn - you the man!)
* pulic school parent(s)
* other blogger
* fiscal conservative
* and three or four random commentators
I can't believe everyone is spending so much time commenting on commenting! Let's move on to more important issues!
The Record examines the issue today:
Internet creates political minefield
Troll?
I'd say that was offensive and uncalled for. I post about the things that politicians and elected officials DO. Lonegan has no case and will end up paying me for trying to scare me off with his lawsuit (What was he thinking), everything I ever said about him is true and he has no case. In fact, his suit doesn't declare any of my posts false thus he'll lose rather quickly if he doesn't amend his complaint.
Do the elected officials of Teaneck know that an employee of the Fire Department was posting derogatory snipes at me while on duty (after the suit was settled?)?
What are they going to do about it?
If the answer is nothing I mightjust take you up on your invite to post here regularly. Someone has already taken my name so it might be tough.
Give me link to SEO software (promotion, advertisement, etc.). I'm need it to promote my new e-shop.
Thanks.
Post a Comment
<< Home