Teaneck Blog

Casting a wary eye on Teaneck politics and municipal affairs

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

The Teaneck 6

There is more than enough blame to go around for the controversy and ill-feeling 
surrounding an incident in which six students from Thomas Jefferson Middle
School
were briefly detained and ticketed for walking in the street after dismissal.
After reading the Suburbanite's front page account of the hubbub, I am left
wondering which of the aggrieved parties will show the character and maturity to
apologize and admit their role in the escalation.

The Teaneck Police Department is one candidate. While law enforcement
officials can legitimately claim that officers were just doing their
jobs when they slapped fines on a group of young violators and returned
them to school,
a department that spends hundreds of thousands of dollars on
community
policing and efforts to improve its relations with residents should
know better than to frighten, intimidate, and humiliate our children in
the process of carrying out its duty to keep order and protect public
safety. How about an admission from the TPD that this could have been
handled better and that in the future, officers will use better judgment
when making an example of people, even if those people had been
previously warned to obey the law?

Another group who may want to step back from the brink is the parents
of the children who were ticketed. Sure, any parent in the same position
would loudly protest the way in which this situation was (mis)handled
and the way their child was treated. However, it seems clear that
administration of the middle school cooperated with the police and issued numerous
instructions and warnings to the students not to engage in the very behavior
their children
allegedly engaged in.

"[TJ Principal Antoine Green] said he told the students, but kids will
be kids. If he had informed us that the police would be issuing
summonses, we would have instructed our children not to walk in the street,"
one parent said, according to the Suburbanite. One may express anger at
how certain parties may have acted, but excusing the children's failure
to heed warnings or obey the school principal on the grounds that the
parents were not aware of the punishment and therefore did not
explicitly tell their children to follow this specific rule suggests that the
parents may not be blameless here.

Finally, a couple of other individuals ought to retract statements made in the heat
of the moment. One prominent resident is quoted as threatening the Township with
"the biggest demonstration you ever had in Teaneck" in response to the incident.
Given
past history, that is quite a loaded comment. And though it is possible that
he is being
quoted somewhat out of context, new Board of Education President Dr.
Henry Pruitt
should know better than to take sides here. Snidely commenting that
"if the police want
to empty their ticket books, they should spend their time on Cedar
Lane," is neither helpful
nor a good example for the youth in the school system, who
should not see the elected leader
of the school system expressing disdain for the
police in public.


Let's not forget that this incident began with children and our children are
watching how those
they look up to go about responding to it.

55 Comments:

At 11:49 AM, Blogger esther said...

My spy tells me local network news trucks are filming traffic on Cedar Lane at this time (Noon on Wednesay). Could it be related to the growing tempest? Tune in tonight on CBS...

 
At 12:25 PM, Blogger PublicSchoolParent said...

Yours are the most thoughtful and responsible comments I've read on this episode, thank you.

 
At 12:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can confirm that ABC 7 had a van parked in front of Adam's Cafe right around 11:30 this morning. I can also confirm that several jaywalkers literally stepped in front of my car as I was driving up Cedar Lane. Today would be an excellent day for the town to make a LOT of money collecting jaywalking fines.

The police need to document for the public exactly what jaywalking ticketing campaigns they've done, how many tickets issued, etc. If what they (the police) say about the TJ incident is true -- and that's really the crux of the matter -- I'm not sure I find a tremendous amount of fault in what they've done. I'm left wondering what, exactly, the police should have done differently. If you warn people several times, work with the schools, schools make calls home, teachers stand outside and warn kids, what's left?

 
At 12:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The crys of racial profiling are outrageous and insulting to our overall intelligence.

Does it take a genius to realize that if the school features a predominantly African-American population that statistically, the likelihood of finding an offender who is not African-American is very low?

Teaneck police (or any other police department) cannot be everywhere to enforce every ordinance. How many times have you seen a blatant traffic offense and say "where's a cop when you need one?" The simple fact is that they are not omnipotent.

A friend of mine was recently pulled over by a police officer while making a right turn from Cedar to Garrison (she had the light). It seems a pedestrian was off the sidewalk and in the street, against the light. While I was taught pedestrians do have the right of way, stupidity on the pedestrian's part is partially to blame.

I don't know how stopping Jaywalking prevents vandalism, but if it does, I'm for it as the driver's side of my wife's car was keyed up on Hartwell by someone walking on the street.

 
At 12:59 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The police are not necessarily known for their tact in dealing with children. My 12 yr old son was stopped by police in Votee for allegedly 'exposing his butt crack' (wearing his pants too low)

Nevermind the fact that my son was dressed for a basketball game with basketball shorts and long tee shirt - but when my husband stepped in to find out what was the matter, the phrase 'butt crack' never entered the conversation. How is it appropriate to use that term to a 12 yr old but not to a 50 yr old?

Not that we are not without a sense of humor, it's very heartening to find that our town employs fashion police!

 
At 1:48 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

black or white - just don't jaywalk.

Jackie Kates' comments comparing this to tensions in the 1990's are disgusting.

 
At 2:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many in Teaneck will always complain, accuse and criticize. The police would be on the chopping block if a child were hurt or killed becuase of jaywalking or not paying attention while crossing busy streets. Why are council (Lissette) and school board members (Henry) not supporting our police and school principal? Why are some parents able to attend meetings to scold and find fault, but not attend regular PTA meetings? The media loves Teaneck; we step from one pile of problematic you know what to the next; the price of a large, diverse, educated (some), opinionated and sometimes unfairly angry population.

 
At 2:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why should the TPD apologize for upholding the law? The schools and the TPD gave repeated warnings to the student body and the parents, some listened others did not and broke the law.
The people that should apologize, are the people that broke the law!

 
At 5:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jaywalking (and crossing the RR too!) is a community concern for years that just won't go away.

I can understand the frustration felt by the police, drivers, let alone the majority of kids who behave, although I agree this tactic and/or the way it was handled is not the ideal solution.

Could there be a well-publicised and organized "warning blitz". Basically approach the kids, communicate the same message, but without financial penalty?

Maybe its not just cops but volunteers (could be parents, teachers etc.. too)?

I'm sure some headway would be made with a strong approach. Even respectable adults make illegal turns or cross the street out of the crosswalk from time to time probably because they believe they aren't being watched or are not thinking about the risk or impact of others of their decisions.

Not sure though what to do next with the kids who ignore the warnings or answer back to those giving them... what else can be effective?

 
At 7:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jaywalking is epidemic in this town. If the TPD put a couple of "god forbid" beat cops on Cedar Lane and blitzed with tickets, it might help. The intersection of Cedar Lane and Garrison is particulary problematic because pedestrian compliance is near zero. Everybody, drivers and pedestrians alike, gets their unimpeded chance to move with the green. Still the pedestrians can't seem to resist crossing in front of cars stopped at a red signal.

Now for the elephant in the livingroom. The students were ticketed for walking down the middle of the street in a residential neighborhood in Teaneck. While this may not be racial profiling, it is by any standard, highly selective enforcement. I guess who gets ticketed for this behavior depends on who you are, where you are and what day of the week it occurs. Passive aggressive behavior by one group ought not to be punished unless the rules are applied equally across the board to all of our residents including our Orthodox friends.

 
At 7:59 PM, Blogger esther said...

I suspect that the focus on kids walking home from school does have something to do with the recent hiring of five officers ostensibly to combat the "gang" problem. The police department now must justify the huge expenditure through a visible "broken windows" style campaign of aggressive enforcement of petty offenses.

 
At 9:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If it is true that neighbors complained to the TPD, I believe the police are obliged to issue summonses to those who are breaking a law.

Years ago, on the Jewish High Holidays, parking near the Jewish Center was at a premium. If I didn't want to park a 1/4 mile away, I would sometimes park close to an intersection or commit some other, what I considered minor, parking infraction.

Normally I would return to my car and my windshield would be summons-free. However, if a neighbor complained to the TPD, and a law was broken, the TPD had to ticket, in one instance, me.

At first, I thought this was unfriendly and a little anti-semitic given that it was a holiday and parking was at a premium, but I soon realized I was at fault and the neighbor had every right to complain. I didn't follow the law and I was punished. It is as simple as that.

And if what I understand to be the truth, that the TJ Middle School administration has been actively and over-time warning the students to avoid such behavior (according the the school's principal), and there was a complaint to the TPD, there is no explanation needed for issuing summonses.

I don't believe this is an issue of race nor is it an issue of unfair law enforcement (I know many, many people who have been issued jaywalking summonses on Cedar Lane, my mother among them), it is however, due punishment for law breakers no matter how young they are and how "minor" the infraction.

I understand the initial angry reaction, it would be hypocritical of me not to, but I also hope that in short order, a more reasonable response will prevail.

Enough said.

 
At 9:56 PM, Blogger esther said...

Well put anonym - you should blog more often.

As for whether these kids were specifically warned about jaywalking, I asked my 10.5 year old who attends BF whether the teachers or administrators had discussed the issue of jaywalking with them or issued any warnings at school this year and she said no. And those who know her, know that she's the type of kid who remembers everything and has a healthy respect for authority at school. At home is another matter.

 
At 12:36 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Try driving on forest ave. when the HS lets out. It's unsafe and dangerous.

ALL kids want to walk four a breast in the street.

Kudos to the TPD for stepping up.

 
At 10:26 AM, Blogger esther said...

To be fair, I've often seen adults walking four abreast down the middle of the street, some even pushing baby carriages.

If the police are going to be aggressive in enforcing the law - they have to enforce it fairly.

 
At 10:27 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many of our local public school youth have no clue regarding litter control, proper walking, respect for the residential areas and neighbors. The school scores speak for themselves, when compared to surrounding BC towns and villages. Many of us wonder what these children and young adults learn at home?

 
At 10:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ever see the way students leaving THS drive? Another accident waiting to happen.

 
At 11:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Law enforcement isn't always fair. I suspect the TPD are doing their best in our volatile, little hamlet.

Also, weren't they responding to a neighbor's complaint. Let's not lose sight of that.

Would it be better if the TPD spent a Friday in a Muslim part of town to scour for law breakers, then, perhaps a Saturday in a Jewish area to look for offenders, one day target Blacks, the next, the Hispanics and Phillippinos, and so on.

If you want the law enforced, not evenly, just enforced, call the TPD and file a complaint. When you see people walking 4 abreast in the street or jaywalking, get on your cell phone (if in your car, hands free, of course) and call. I don't think the police will arrive in time to catch the jaywalkers, but they probably will to punish the street-walkers.

May I sincerely recommend that people who are uneasy about the TPD sign up for the Teaneck Police Academy. It's free and very worthwhile. I certainly have more respect for our police than I did before I took the course.

I'll grant you the TPD are not perfect, but who is?

 
At 12:54 PM, Blogger Karin said...

I dont think people are "uneasy" about the TPD, I for one wonder when they will actually start doing their jobs!

I really think that the TPD needs a refresher course on town ordinances and state law.
Perhaps this may help them enforce the laws better.

 
At 1:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I asked the mother of a 9th grader, whose child was at TJ last year, if the kids were routinely warned about jaywalking then. Her answer was a resounding, "yes!" She said the kids heard about it at assemblies, that teachers stood outside the school to remind kids to stay on the sidewalk, and that they had regular PA announcements about it. Perhaps there haven't been any complaints from residents around BF and that would explain the difference?

 
At 1:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many kids do not listen or hear;
nor do the parents! The schools can do as much educating as possible....the students must be parented in the home.

 
At 2:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most kids at both middle schools are good and law abiding. THS as well. BF has had its share of area jay walking, (railroad/tunnel?) vandalism, fighting and other "juvenile" acts of stupidity.

 
At 9:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This was a fair and balanced post by the blogger. Also well written. Glad I stumbled across this blog. Thanks Esther for posting a link to this blog. I don't agree with everything I've read in the archives but it is extremely well written. And thoughtful, too. Good luck

 
At 12:57 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Definitely fairer and more balanced than the two hatchet jobs we saw on the op ed pages of today's Sunday Record.

 
At 5:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A majority of the Teaneck Public School children should be sent to IRAQ- there attitude and lack of consideration will get the enemy to surrender in no time. And if they gewt blown up...no major loss

 
At 10:32 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

With apologies for cross-posting something I posted on Teaneck Progress, I'd like to respond to anonymous 7:59p...

As an orthodox Jew who lives 1/3 mile from his temple, I would love to have the opportunity to walk on a sidewalk...if there was one to begin with.

Within that 1/3 mile walk, the only sidewalk that exists is a small 2-block stretch along East Cedar Lane. I walk on that sidewalk and enjoy the sense of safety it provides for my family as we walk to and from on Sabbath and holidays.

Then I walk on to Country Club Rd to East Lawn Dr, (some call it East Lawn Parkway) to Perry Lane where the sidewalk begins 10 feet from my temple's driveway. There are no sidewalks to be seen anywhere else. None.

So I walk along the curb with my 4.5 yo child as I don't feel right walking on someone's grass (possible chemicals laid down, who knows, they leave the signs up all year round), petunias, big Teaneck tree roots, etc. But now there's a car parked and I have to walk in the street. Feeling real safe now. People come driving down East Lawn at higher speeds than I feel safe. Cars parked on both sides of East Lawn with cars coming to and fro. You get the picture? Not exactly pedestrian friendly.

Wait it gets better...Around the fall when the leaves start to fall, the piles of leaves are left in the street until they eventually get picked up, creating one more reason to have to walk in the street.

So before someone else starts yelling "The Jews walk in the street all the time", let's take a look as to why we do. Some may walk in the street because they are just as ignorant as the Teaneck 6 and should be ticketed as well. Others do because of necessity.

As for myself, I wish we had sidewalk but it looks like an impossible task to get accomplished. You need 51% of a block's residents to get a sidewalk installed. Considering this is to be done at resident's cost, not too many are willing to pay the extra amount. Then there are the trees. Will Teaneck be willing to allow their trees to be cut down to allow safe passage for their pedestrians? Unlikely.

The kids who walk down Hartwell and their parents were dumb. Plain and simple. Not only do they have the availability of utilizing the safety provided by sidewalks on both sides of the street, they've been warned and the school has made every effort to inform them and their parents of the consequences of their actions.

I wish I had sidewalk.

 
At 12:52 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

My daughter is in the ninth grade after 4 years of Ben Franklin Middle School and every sememster, a flyer came home with a warning not to walk in the street, among other behaviors that were being warned against.

 
At 5:51 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If it is true that neighbors complained to the TPD, I believe the police are obliged to issue summonses to those who are breaking a law.

There are certain laws for which the police have no discretion. If they catch someone for a statuatory crime (e.g. rape of a minor) they must make an arrest. But in the case of jaywalking, there is plenty of discretion at play. Also, I doubt that the residents called about specific students.

I'm not saying that they were wrong to ticket, but let's not make excuses for them.

Does anyone have the text of the "jaywalking" law? Does merely walking in the street actually violate anything in Teaneck?

 
At 6:58 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

LOOK AT NJSA 39:4-30 through NJSA 39:4-46

ALSO THIS MAY HELP,
http://www.njbikeped.org/bikepednewsletter/Issue_1/index_files/page0004.htm

 
At 7:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Himmelhoch, there is a big difference in the mind of 11-13 year olds between getting a flyer home (yawn, probably ignore it unless your kid is a real kiss up goody goody) and having a police officer talk to them very close up, face to face and at least a head taller. That will put the fear of God or something into them and they won't jaywalk. That is how this should have been handled instead of putting kids in squad cars and scaring the hell out of them.

 
At 9:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Advocate for Truth-

What you're saying is to scare them by talking to/at them, as opposed to scaring them by putting them in a squad car. Can you explain the difference in scaring? It seems to me that once you suggest that scaring is the best tactic, the medium is somewhat inconsequential.

 
At 8:05 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If only the State had a fund set up specifically to deal with this kind of situation....

I'd say that the Teaneck 6 might qualify!

NJSA 39:4-36.2 "Pedestrian Safety Enforcement and Education Fund."
(http://lis.njleg.state.nj.us/cgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?clientID=138244&Depth=2&depth=2&expandheadings=on&headingswithhits=on&hitsperheading=on&infobase=statutes.nfo&record={E31E}&softpage=Document42)
1.There is created in the Division of Highway and Traffic Safety in the Department of Law and Public Safety a nonlapsing revolving fund to be known as the "Pedestrian Safety Enforcement and Education Fund." This fund shall be a repository for moneys provided pursuant to subsection c. of R.S.39:4-36 and shall be administered by the Division of Highway and Traffic Safety. Moneys deposited in the fund, and any interest earned thereon, shall be used for the purpose of making grants to municipalities and counties with pedestrian safety problems. Priority in awarding grants shall be given to municipalities and counties requesting funds in order to take remedial steps for intersections that have been identified as demonstrating pedestrian safety problems in accordance with P.L. , c. (C. )(now pending before the Legislature as Senate Bill No. 251(2R)).

L.2005,c.86,s.1.

 
At 8:58 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Norma,
Words really hit home, but the act of putting a kid in a squad car can be so terrifying that they can block out any reason as to why they are there. I know its difficult for an adult, buy try to put yourself in the shoes of kids this age and remember what you were like. Being put in the back of a squad car is much more frightening without any real lessons learned than having a large officer standing over you and speaking sternly.

 
At 9:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the "scarier" method depends on one's point of view. Be that as it may, in your posts you appear to be advocating to scare the children, and what I was seeking in my earlier post was your reasoning for why it's okay to scare them using your preferred method instead of the one that was actually used.

Mind you, I'm not advocating for either, necessarily, just trying to understand how "putting the fear of god or something into them" is better than "scaring the hell our of them."

 
At 9:21 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

toughen up, wussies

 
At 11:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Norma,
I only believe in scaring kids if parents are not doing their job and teaching them proper behavior. Seems to be rampant. Maybe if the kids are scared the parents will wake up and do their job. I certainly did and my kids are all ladies and gentlemen - and always have been age appropriately.

 
At 8:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sounds like we need to scare the parents then

 
At 7:58 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isn't that what just happened?

 
At 9:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yesterday's NYTimes article provides the most balanced view I've read of the jaywalking situation on Hartwell St. The article points out that there are about 200 students leaving school via Hartwell at dismissal, and that cars are driving down Hartwell toward the school at the same time to pick up students. In addition, the article does a good job of explaining the outreach that began last June to educate students. See http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/07colnj.html

 
At 9:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry - here's the whole link --

http://www.nytimes.com/
2007/10/07/nyregion/
nyregionspecial2/
07colnj.html

 
At 10:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whatever happened to all your bad mouth comments to our FF's and your fire house visit??

Why are you using your "Karin" name again??

 
At 10:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Above is for "Karin" of teaneck.

 
At 11:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

From today's Record:

TEANECK -- Michael Muscillo resigned as deputy township manager Tuesday, one week after starting his job.

Township Manager Helene Fall said the Long Branch native had chosen to accept a position closer to his hometown; she would not give any further detail. Muscillo was to be paid $80,000 a year. Fall said the town would re-advertise for the position and begin its search anew.

-- Joseph Ax

 
At 8:11 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is this blog still active?!?!?!?

 
At 10:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

NJ 101.5 radio talked about this situation. Can you even get NJ101.5 in Teaneck? Last time I tried it was there faintly along with a station playing reggae.

 
At 10:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gostei muito desse post e seu blog é muito interessante, vou passar por aqui sempre =) Depois dá uma passada lá no meu site, que é sobre o CresceNet, espero que goste. O endereço dele é http://www.provedorcrescenet.com . Um abraço.

 
At 11:43 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello. This post is likeable, and your blog is very interesting, congratulations :-). I will add in my blogroll =). If possible gives a last there on my blog, it is about the Webcam, I hope you enjoy. The address is http://webcam-brasil.blogspot.com. A hug.

 
At 9:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Teaneck Police is a hostile enforcement agency. ‎‏ ‏Why do they not enforce 25 MPH ‎speeding on cedar lane; instead they J-Walk ticket? ‎

 
At 2:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

[url=http://sunkomutors.net/][img]http://sunkomutors.net/img-add/euro2.jpg[/img][/url]
[b]software to buy tickets, [url=http://sunkomutors.net/]adobe photoshop cs4 portable[/url]
[url=http://sunkomutors.net/][/url] software microsoft word buy macromedia flash professional 8
maths educational software [url=http://sunkomutors.net/]educator software discounts[/url] crack nero 9
[url=http://sunkomutors.net/]discount music software[/url] discount computer software
[url=http://sunkomutors.net/]compare educational software[/url] academic & collegiate software
filemaker pro 10 bible release date [url=http://sunkomutors.net/]canadian educational software[/b]

 
At 4:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi !.
might , perhaps very interested to know how one can make real money .
There is no initial capital needed You may commense to receive yields with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich
The company represents an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

It is based in Panama with offices around the world.
Do you want to become an affluent person?
That`s your chance That`s what you really need!

I`m happy and lucky, I started to take up income with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. If it gets down to choose a proper companion who uses your money in a right way - that`s it!.
I earn US$2,000 per day, and my first investment was 500 dollars only!
It`s easy to start , just click this link http://udogunowun.freecities.com/lijuhymi.html
and lucky you`re! Let`s take our chance together to feel the smell of real money

 
At 12:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi !.
You re, I guess , perhaps curious to know how one can manage to receive high yields .
There is no initial capital needed You may start earning with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich
The firm represents an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

Its head office is in Panama with affiliates everywhere: In USA, Canada, Cyprus.
Do you want to become a happy investor?
That`s your choice That`s what you really need!

I`m happy and lucky, I began to take up real money with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. If it gets down to choose a proper partner utilizes your savings in a right way - that`s the AimTrust!.
I make 2G daily, and my first investment was 500 dollars only!
It`s easy to get involved , just click this link http://ykyticumec.easyfreehosting.com/irupaty.html
and go! Let`s take this option together to feel the smell of real money

 
At 7:36 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi there!
I would like to burn a theme at here. There is such a thing, called HYIP, or High Yield Investment Program. It reminds of financial piramyde, but in rare cases one may happen to meet a company that really pays up to 2% daily not on invested money, but from real profits.

For several years , I earn money with the help of these programs.
I'm with no money problems now, but there are heights that must be conquered . I make 2G daily, and my first investment was 500 dollars only.
Right now, I'm very close at catching at last a guaranteed variant to make a sharp rise . Turn to my blog to get additional info.

http://theinvestblog.com [url=http://theinvestblog.com]Online Investment Blog[/url]

 
At 2:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi!
You may probably be very interested to know how one can make real money on investments.
There is no initial capital needed.
You may begin earning with a money that usually goes
on daily food, that's 20-100 dollars.
I have been participating in one company's work for several years,
and I'm ready to share my secrets at my blog.

Please visit my pages and send me private message to get the info.

P.S. I earn 1000-2000 per day now.

[url=http://theinvestblog.com] Online investment blog[/url]

 
At 4:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You have really great taste on catch article titles, even when you are not interested in this topic you push to read it

 
At 9:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice post and this mail helped me alot in my college assignement. Thank you for your information.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home